Page Index Toggle Pages: [1]  Print
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Technical question (Read 2984 times)
DG
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 438
Location: Matthews
Joined: 03/01/16
Technical question
01/13/17 at 3:36pm
Print Post  
What do you think of a 2X10 on a MTB? What are the Pros and cons?
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
renoirbud
Small Cog
***
Offline


Newbie

Posts: 442
Location: China Grove
Joined: 12/12/06
Re: Technical question
Reply #1 - 01/13/17 at 4:34pm
Print Post  
2x10 vs 1x11 or 1x12

2x10 is cheaper, 10 speed chains wear out faster.

Unless your going DI2 Shimano, you need two shifters for 2x.

I see no need for a 2x system on a Mtb, all of my bikes are 1x most have a dropper and a chainguide
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

E-Bikes = Trail Closures
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DG
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 438
Location: Matthews
Joined: 03/01/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #2 - 01/13/17 at 5:17pm
Print Post  
renoirbud wrote on 01/13/17 at 4:34pm:
2x10 vs 1x11 or 1x12

2x10 is cheaper, 10 speed chains wear out faster.

Unless your going DI2 Shimano, you need two shifters for 2x.

I see no need for a 2x system on a Mtb, all of my bikes are 1x most have a dropper and a chainguide


I saw that eagle has a nice product in the 1x range. A question, do you find difference using a 12 vs 21 or above? Which one and where?
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cherokee
Little Ring
****
Offline



Posts: 748
Location: Concord
Joined: 08/07/06
Re: Technical question
Reply #3 - 01/13/17 at 5:17pm
Print Post  
I've never owned a 2X10, but I demo'ed one a while back and liked it very much...better than the 3X9 I had at the time because I rarely used the little chain ring anyway. But I like to use the front shifter a lot because it's a bigger jump and I can adjust my gearing back and forth with fewer clicks; particularly on a trail with a lot of elevation change like RRT.  I now have a 1X11 and like it as well. What I like most is the weight savings from completely eliminating the front derailleur, shifter, and cabling. If the weight were the same, I'd personally chose the 2X10; I think it hits the sweet spot operationally for me. But with the weight savings I'd choose the 1x and do the extra shifting.

I know I'm not with the majority in my reasoning however.
« Last Edit: 01/13/17 at 5:23pm by Cherokee »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

"The state is the great fiction by which each of us seeks to live at the expense of all of us."    --19th century French economist Frederic Bastiat
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DG
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 438
Location: Matthews
Joined: 03/01/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #4 - 01/13/17 at 5:24pm
Print Post  
Cherokee wrote on 01/13/17 at 5:17pm:
I've never owned a 2X10, but I demo'ed one a while back and liked it very much...better than the 3X9 I had at the time because I rarely used the little chain ring anyway. But I like to use the front shifter a lot because it's a bigger jump and I can adjust my gearing back and forth with fewer clicks; particularly on a trail with a lot of elevation change like RRT.  I now have a 1X11 and like it as well. What I like most is the weight savings from completely eliminating the front derailleur, shifter, and cabling. If the weight were the same, I'd personally chose the 2X10; I think it's hit the sweet spot operationally for me. But with the weight savings I'd choose the 1x and do the extra shifting.

I know I'm not in the majority in my reasoning however.


Am i right to say that 1x or 2x are perfect for trail while a 3x is more if you do heavy climbs?
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BigBikeMike
Project Board
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 1593
Joined: 06/14/09
Re: Technical question
Reply #5 - 01/13/17 at 6:19pm
Print Post  
I would say that unless you live in the mountains where you have steep long climbs, 1x or 2x is the way to go. That's just my opinion. I like a single speed at LNSP.

BBM
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Banjopickin
Big Ring
*****
Offline


Spinnin' knees & Hittin'
trees since '85

Posts: 1805
Location: Pisgah National Forest, USA
Joined: 08/01/11
Re: Technical question
Reply #6 - 01/13/17 at 7:01pm
Print Post  
DG wrote on 01/13/17 at 3:36pm:
What do you think of a 2X10 on a MTB? What are the Pros and cons?


Pros:
-more range
-looks "old shcool"
-abundance of cheap front derailluers, shifters, etc.

Cons:
-your bike looks like it belongs in 2003
-Heavier
-Not cool
-Totally lame
-do you even ride brahj?


« Last Edit: 01/13/17 at 7:02pm by Banjopickin »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

Advocat wrote on 08/22/13 at 5:16pm:
...packin some Chub in the back of the pick-up.


(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cherokee
Little Ring
****
Offline



Posts: 748
Location: Concord
Joined: 08/07/06
Re: Technical question
Reply #7 - 01/13/17 at 7:10pm
Print Post  
DG wrote on 01/13/17 at 5:24pm:


Am i right to say that 1x or 2x are perfect for trail while a 3x is more if you do heavy climbs?


I would maybe agree with that statement if by "heavy climbs" you mean NC mountains... steep LONG climbs. For around here, I see no need for 3x.  For example, I think 1x is great for Sherman, LNSP, and nearly every other trail around here. I would like the 2x better for RRT and URE, and perhaps WWC. But it's all personal. Probably half the people on this forum would disagree with what I just said. (but half the people are just disagreeable  Smiley !)

That sounds like what BigBikeMike might be saying too.
« Last Edit: 01/13/17 at 7:14pm by Cherokee »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

"The state is the great fiction by which each of us seeks to live at the expense of all of us."    --19th century French economist Frederic Bastiat
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DG
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 438
Location: Matthews
Joined: 03/01/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #8 - 01/13/17 at 7:26pm
Print Post  
Cherokee wrote on 01/13/17 at 7:10pm:


I would maybe agree with that statement if by "heavy climbs" you mean NC mountains... steep LONG climbs. For around here, I see no need for 3x.  For example, I think 1x is great for Sherman, LNSP, and nearly every other trail around here. I would like the 2x better for RRT and URE, and perhaps WWC. But it's all personal. Probably half the people on this forum would disagree with what I just said. (but half the people are just disagreeable  Smiley !)

That sounds like what BigBikeMike might be saying too.


Heavy climbs i was thinking more the  Alps near Torino in Italy where i come from. So now i have a question, why in the hell the majority of MTB's are sold with a 3x if in reality only the 10% of the user will ever use it? Is it only a marketing stunt? I feel great because i have 29 gears bike? 
Sorry for all these questions but I am new to the "real" use of a MTB therefore I need to learn.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
chickenwyre
Coaster Bike
**
Offline



Posts: 126
Location: LoSo
Joined: 09/13/14
Re: Technical question
Reply #9 - 01/13/17 at 8:32pm
Print Post  
Banjopickin wrote on 01/13/17 at 7:01pm:

-do you even ride brahj?



Really can't argue the value/performance of the full XT group. Used to run 10 speed 1X setup with 11-36 in CLT, Dupont, and Pisgah on a 34lb bike. Difficult but not impossible.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Banjopickin
Big Ring
*****
Offline


Spinnin' knees & Hittin'
trees since '85

Posts: 1805
Location: Pisgah National Forest, USA
Joined: 08/01/11
Re: Technical question
Reply #10 - 01/13/17 at 8:59pm
Print Post  
DG wrote on 01/13/17 at 7:26pm:


why in the hell the majority of MTB's are sold with a 3x if in reality only the 10% of the user will ever use it? Is it only a marketing stunt? I feel great because i have 29 gears bike?...


The majority of new bikes are coming 1x11... maybe 2x but even that is rare.

I havent seen new 2017 bike at all with even a 2x... 3x has been off OE spec for at least a couple years now on most modern/large brands.

Lotta talk on needing 2x or 3x for long climbs ala Pisgah/WNC/etc... not so. 11/42t or 44t with even a 32t chainring is plenty for any climbs. I have a buddy running an 11/50t with a 30t chain ring. 30x50 being the granny.... it works and he can clean pretty much anything.
« Last Edit: 01/13/17 at 9:04pm by Banjopickin »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

Advocat wrote on 08/22/13 at 5:16pm:
...packin some Chub in the back of the pick-up.


(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DG
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 438
Location: Matthews
Joined: 03/01/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #11 - 01/13/17 at 9:10pm
Print Post  
Banjopickin wrote on 01/13/17 at 8:59pm:


The majority of new bikes are coming 1x11... maybe 2x but even that is rare.

I havent seen new 2017 bike at all with even a 2x... 3x has been off OE spec for at least a couple years now on most modern/large brands.

Lotta talk on needing 2x or 3x for long climbs ala Pisgah/WNC/etc... not so. 11/42t or 44t with even a 32t chainring is plenty for any climbs. I have a buddy running an 11/50t with a 30t chain ring. 30x50 being the granny.... it works and he can clean pretty much anything.


Long time i have been bought my bike! It seems yesterday
« Last Edit: 01/13/17 at 9:10pm by DG »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Enoch
Forum Administrator
IB Room
Project Board
In The Loop
*****
Offline


Walked with God and he
was not

Posts: 8702
Joined: 05/08/04
Re: Technical question
Reply #12 - 01/13/17 at 9:41pm
Print Post  
My bike runs 3 rings up front. Seems to work well for me. But maybe I dont ride enough brahj?

I'm sure the single rings are cool, and they work well for people that can't a handle front derailer, but I like the nice tight ratio in the back. I run 11/32 cassette.

If I had to do a start over build, I would prolly go 2x. I like Shimano stuff, I have no intresting in Srams huge, expensive cassettes.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

Do what you like. Stop hating people for their riding habits and get back to hating them for their skin color, religion, politics, and sexual orientation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DG
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 438
Location: Matthews
Joined: 03/01/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #13 - 01/13/17 at 9:48pm
Print Post  
Enoch wrote on 01/13/17 at 9:41pm:
My bike runs 3 rings up front. Seems to work well for me. But maybe I dont ride enough brahj?

I'm sure the single rings are cool, and they work well for people that can't a handle front derailer, but I like the nice tight ratio in the back. I run 11/32 cassette.

If I had to do a start over build, I would prolly go 2x. I like Shimano stuff, I have no intresting in Srams huge, expensive cassettes.


Glad to hear I am not the white fly.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Enoch
Forum Administrator
IB Room
Project Board
In The Loop
*****
Offline


Walked with God and he
was not

Posts: 8702
Joined: 05/08/04
Re: Technical question
Reply #14 - 01/13/17 at 10:30pm
Print Post  
DG wrote on 01/13/17 at 9:48pm:


Glad to hear I am not the white fly.


Funniest part is 80% of the time I'm on a Single Speed and about 1/2 of that time it is fully Rigid. So it is more about what you want and what is fun for you.

Don't let trends and media drive you around
« Last Edit: 01/13/17 at 10:31pm by Enoch »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

Do what you like. Stop hating people for their riding habits and get back to hating them for their skin color, religion, politics, and sexual orientation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IntheBush
Big Ring
*****
Offline



Posts: 2031
Location: South of the border
Joined: 10/30/09
Re: Technical question
Reply #15 - 01/13/17 at 10:42pm
Print Post  
2x's are more common in Europe.

Why do you need a big ring, unless you're on a road bike?
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The Cycle Path
IB Room
In The Loop
Project Board
Offline


Treasurer '11 to '18.
Trail Chair '12-'18,
'20-'21

Posts: 11858
Location: Lake Norman
Joined: 08/04/03
Re: Technical question
Reply #16 - 01/14/17 at 7:38am
Print Post  
Some bikes come with 3 rings up front when they have 7,8 or 9 gears in the back.  That's due to gear range in the rear gears.  If you have 7 gears in the back your lowest gear will likely by a 30 or 32 tooth.  8 or 9 gears, it will be 32 or 34. 10 spd will likely have a 36 and most 11 spd are 40,42 or 46 in the rear.  Some bikes are coming with 2x11 drivetrains if they're Shimano.

One of my favorite bikes ran a 2x10 drivetrain. 24/36 on the front and an 11-36 in the rear.  The 12 tooth difference in the front was great for dropping quick to a climbing gear with only one click.  Then I got a 1x11 and just forgot all about it.  Was easy to adapt to each for me.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

We carry the finest from Specialized, Yeti, Transition, and Kona.
Back to top
IP Logged
 
808golden
Little Ring
****
Offline


More beer, please!

Posts: 583
Location: LKNM
Joined: 08/20/08
Re: Technical question
Reply #17 - 01/14/17 at 4:39pm
Print Post  
Today at 2:38am ?  Get some sleep man!  And open Fisher!! Cheesy
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Impaler 58
Big Ring
*****
Offline



Posts: 2111
Location: Statesville
Joined: 01/21/09
Re: Technical question
Reply #18 - 01/14/17 at 6:16pm
Print Post  
I got my bike when 2x were all the rage. And to stay on the lower cost side, it was equipped with a 9 speed 12x36 I believe. The front has a 32/22. It has served me well over the past 6years. I had gone to a SS after the 3x. Then from the SS to 2x. So whatever and whenever I get a new bike. What ever is the standard then,is what I will go with. I got a triple crankset on my road bike. Folks told me all I needed was a compact double for around here. But I like having the 30 as a bailout. It's helped me plenty when riding the mountains. But you should go with your abilities then the latest trend. That ride yourself into shape doesn't work the same for all
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
sCvHeaVens
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 447
Location: Charlotte, NC
Joined: 02/12/15
Re: Technical question
Reply #19 - 01/16/17 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
I'll add my two cents....

The reason you had 3 rings before was to get the short and tall gear ratios you actually needed, now with 10+ gears in the back it's a lot easier to get a gear ratio that is short enough for most people's top speed and tall enough for steep climbs.

With that said for riders whom ride a good bit a 1X10 system is sufficient and I would say for 90% of people the 1x11 geared correctly is sufficient, then there is the 1x12 for beginners who can't make it up the green trail climbs.

The biggest issue with 1x11 is getting it sized correctly b/c a lot of bikes will only accept 30-34 rings due to chain stay clearance.  I ride a 34/11-42 and COULD go to a 36/11-42 but A) it doesn't fit and B) I've only found myself asking for a shorter gear a few times.   

Going back to what Jerry said - you need to find your preference... personally If I'm going to ride forest roads / gravel / anything I will consistently ride 20+MPH this is where the 1X setups lack and I will want a purpose built bike and a 3X setup.  For 99% of the riding I currently do (local trails & mountains) I'll never look back from my 1X setup.

I'm 225lbs and going to a 1X10 (32/11-36) sucked at first, but you will get used to it and it will make you a faster climber just like single speed will.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The Cycle Path
IB Room
In The Loop
Project Board
Offline


Treasurer '11 to '18.
Trail Chair '12-'18,
'20-'21

Posts: 11858
Location: Lake Norman
Joined: 08/04/03
Re: Technical question
Reply #20 - 01/16/17 at 2:27pm
Print Post  
sCvHeaVens wrote on 01/16/17 at 1:58pm:
I'll add my two cents....

The reason you had 3 rings before was to get the short and tall gear ratios you actually needed, now with 10+ gears in the back it's a lot easier to get a gear ratio that is short enough for most people's top speed and tall enough for steep climbs.

With that said for riders whom ride a good bit a 1X10 system is sufficient and I would say for 90% of people the 1x11 geared correctly is sufficient, then there is the 1x12 for beginners who can't make it up the green trail climbs.

The biggest issue with 1x11 is getting it sized correctly b/c a lot of bikes will only accept 30-34 rings due to chain stay clearance.  I ride a 34/11-42 and COULD go to a 36/11-42 but A) it doesn't fit and B) I've only found myself asking for a shorter gear a few times.  

Going back to what Jerry said - you need to find your preference... personally If I'm going to ride forest roads / gravel / anything I will consistently ride 20+MPH this is where the 1X setups lack and I will want a purpose built bike and a 3X setup.  For 99% of the riding I currently do (local trails & mountains) I'll never look back from my 1X setup.

I'm 225lbs and going to a 1X10 (32/11-36) sucked at first, but you will get used to it and it will make you a faster climber just like single speed will. 


I agree with most everything you said but that. What 1x12 really helps with is having a bigger gear, 34t/36t, in the front for the high end without losing your climbing gears.  I found I liked the 30x42 ratio for some sections in the mountains (all the ones that went "UP" Shocked )  But the 30x10 ratio was too easy to spin out on the flats and gradual descents.  Now is that really necessary in the immediate area?  IMO, no.  Is it nice to have in the mountains here or on the west coast?  Yes.  Smiley

  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

We carry the finest from Specialized, Yeti, Transition, and Kona.
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Doc00t
IB Room
In The Loop
Project Board
Offline


When in DOUBT, PEDAL it
OUT

Posts: 1785
Location: University
Joined: 05/09/12
Re: Technical question
Reply #21 - 01/16/17 at 6:16pm
Print Post  
DG wrote on 01/13/17 at 3:36pm:
What do you think of a 2X10 on a MTB? What are the Pros and cons?



Pros
-Exercise from weight of extra parts 
-Extra stops during your ride to rest when you are forced to put the chain back on again, and again
-Your able to wear your chain out faster when you decide that 22x11 feels really good on that particular climb

Cons
See above

You move slightly slower walking then 1x10
You move the same speed walking when 1x11
You move faster walking when using 1x12

Plus their is a lot less to go wrong when 1x

That said, Its still a free country.  Ride what feels good to you, but do it with Decals because they make you faster

« Last Edit: 01/16/17 at 6:17pm by Doc00t »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

Scars are like Tattoos only with better Stories
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sCvHeaVens
Small Cog
***
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 447
Location: Charlotte, NC
Joined: 02/12/15
Re: Technical question
Reply #22 - 01/16/17 at 8:22pm
Print Post  
The Cycle Path wrote on 01/16/17 at 2:27pm:


I agree with most everything you said but that. What 1x12 really helps with is having a bigger gear, 34t/36t, in the front for the high end without losing your climbing gears.  I found I liked the 30x42 ratio for some sections in the mountains (all the ones that went "UP" Shocked )  But the 30x10 ratio was too easy to spin out on the flats and gradual descents.  Now is that really necessary in the immediate area?  IMO, no.  Is it nice to have in the mountains here or on the west coast?  Yes.  Smiley




But that goes back to my point about the chainstay; you can't get a shorter gear b/c your limited by how big you can go with the front ring (usually 34, sometimes 36) on the most modern xc/trail mountain bikes.  Since you cant really go smaller than 10/11 I don't see getting much more out of the 1x12.  That's why I think the higher number of gears the more it starts leaning towards making it easier to climb.  I would like a 36 even on my 1x11 but it wont fit; so there is no reason for me to consider 1x12.   

With that said I have not seen a bike designed for 1x12 in person; maybe you can fit a 40T on those, but I've seen the chainstay issue be a limit for a lot of ppl.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ChosenOne
Little Ring
****
Offline



Posts: 600
Joined: 11/02/08
Re: Technical question
Reply #23 - 01/16/17 at 11:24pm
Print Post  
My transition trans-am is a 2x10 and it is fast as $hit.  My Ellsworth Moment is a 3x9 converted to a 2x9 with a 34 tooth and it handles like a dream...   Not as fast  but what a sweet ride.

2x10 is really fast for me.  If my Ellsworth was a 2x10 I'd never ride the hard tail. 

« Last Edit: 01/16/17 at 11:25pm by ChosenOne »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Patches
Coaster Bike
**
Offline


Work Ride Tarheel Trailblazers

Posts: 124
Location: Concord, NC
Joined: 12/11/10
Re: Technical question
Reply #24 - 01/17/17 at 12:20am
Print Post  
Finding that the 1 x 10 conversion (30 tooth Wolf Tooth front chain ring and 11 x 40 tooth 10 speed conversion cassette) works very well on my FS 29er.  No problem with any of the climbs, descents, fire roads, etc., for any of the CLT area trails including Rocky River Trail.  My 11 x 40 conversion cassette was created from a Shimano 11 x 36 10 speed XT cassette through the subtraction of the 15 and 17 tooth cogs and through the addition of 16 tooth and 40 tooth cogs from Wolf Tooth Components.  This conversion cassette was installed over 2 years ago and it is just now showing visual signs of needing replacement.  I have been mixing my riding up about 50/50 between this bike and a SS over the last year.  My 2 year old chain is just now approaching the replacement wear limit.  The front chain ring is showing minimal wear.  I just placed an order for a Praxis Works 11 x 40 cassette (no conversions cogs required), so looking forward to seeing how this cassette works.  

Plans are to move to Shimano 1 x 11 when my SRAM X0 10 speed clutch derailleur and shifter wear out.  Finding that the 1 x 10 and future state 1 x 11 works extremely well for my riding style and capabilities.  No plans to move back to 2 x system. 
« Last Edit: 01/17/17 at 12:22am by Patches »  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The Cycle Path
IB Room
In The Loop
Project Board
Offline


Treasurer '11 to '18.
Trail Chair '12-'18,
'20-'21

Posts: 11858
Location: Lake Norman
Joined: 08/04/03
Re: Technical question
Reply #25 - 01/17/17 at 12:52am
Print Post  
sCvHeaVens wrote on 01/16/17 at 8:22pm:



But that goes back to my point about the chainstay; you can't get a shorter gear b/c your limited by how big you can go with the front ring (usually 34, sometimes 36) on the most modern xc/trail mountain bikes.  Since you cant really go smaller than 10/11 I don't see getting much more out of the 1x12.  That's why I think the higher number of gears the more it starts leaning towards making it easier to climb.  I would like a 36 even on my 1x11 but it wont fit; so there is no reason for me to consider 1x12.  

With that said I have not seen a bike designed for 1x12 in person; maybe you can fit a 40T on those, but I've seen the chainstay issue be a limit for a lot of ppl.

Well there are some of us that like having a lower gear to climb and it really comes down to personal fitness.  My 17 Camber Pro could fit a 36t on the front if I wanted to but I find the 32t with 10-50 works for me both locally and in the mountains. Smiley   

Besides, I want a bail out gear AND short chain stays.  Which by the way are the tits on the new Camber 29ers!!
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

We carry the finest from Specialized, Yeti, Transition, and Kona.
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Skaufma0
Coaster Bike
**
Offline



Posts: 86
Location: Charlotte, NC / Rock Hill, SC
Joined: 01/08/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #26 - 01/17/17 at 6:08am
Print Post  
Mine is a 2x11, but only because it was originally a 3x9. I just removed the big ring and upgraded the rear setup. I've been wanting to upgrade the front to a 1x but instead I'm saving the cash for a newer bike anyway. I pulled the big ring off to avoid catching it on rocks and stumps (and I never saw the point of having it anyway).

But with all that said, if I was building the bike from the ground up then I would just go for the 1x setup straight away. That extra low gear is rarely used in this area.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 3
2000 Gary Fisher Mamba
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
abruzzopat
Little Ring
****
Offline


Irritating animated GIF...
I'll remove it soon.

Posts: 519
Location: Belmont, NC
Joined: 06/29/14
Re: Technical question
Reply #27 - 01/17/17 at 8:23pm
Print Post  
The other nice thing about the 1X10 or 1X11 is you generally get a little more clearance rolling over rocks and logs.

I rarely use the little gear in back... by the time I'm going fast enough there's a tree up ahead! Shocked
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
StevenA
Coaster Bike
**
Offline



Posts: 162
Joined: 06/28/16
Re: Technical question
Reply #28 - 01/22/17 at 6:43pm
Print Post  
Doc00t wrote on 01/16/17 at 6:16pm:

You move the same speed walking when 1x11

Challenge accepted!
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) (Attachment deleted)

I used to be addicted to the Hokey Pokey but then I turned myself around.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 
Print