Banjopickin wrote on 10/18/17 at 3:37pm:
Nothing wrong with folks trying new things... Just cause someone likes to try new technology they are somehow not "pure" or "not real mtb'ers"?
Hell, 150+ years ago the bicycle was considered a new fangled technological metal monster. "why would I need that when my horse is perfectly fine!?!"
Why have any of this when we can live like we did 200 years ago?
No ones making you ride anything and if you dont like it dont use it... sounds like you are already doing that so why throw hate on those who want to try it?
Not every mountain biker is in it for the tech or whatever... Come to the Pisgah and I will show you the mountains young grasshopper...
I understand what your saying, the rub is when someone else's choices affect my ability to do what I chose to do.
If E-bikers tick off land managers, trail will get closed for all bikes, unless there is a clear differentiation between pedal power and battery power. (twist throttle or pedal assist etc... its the same to an non cycling observer).
I have run into an E-biker one time, Freedom Park, Williamsburg, VA. The Ebiker went into the directional in front of me, and at the end of the A trail the Ebiker decide it would be best use of his battery to ride the B trail backwards. So we came together head on on the B trail. Not a collision.
But lets say that my daughter was on the trail riding the correct direction, working on getting skills and confidence. Should she have to put up with this?
Is every Ebiker like this?
Maybe;
Christina Turner got run-over and injured by an Ebiker going the wrong way.
I had to deal with a near head on collision on a trail where Ebikes are banned and the Ebike was coming the wrong way.
The (self proclaimed) president of CLT Ebikes declared that as long as people get out of his way when he is riding his ebike uphill,'we will not have a problem' (I hope he has taken those words down from that thread regarding Ebikes at WWC)