hardtales wrote on 08/01/17 at 1:39am:
If it's designed "properly"/sustainably, it shouldn't erode very much.
All trails made of dirt, erode.
Period.
hardtales wrote on 08/01/17 at 1:39am:
You can actually design a trail with bumps and challenging features. Creating a smooth track that drains poorly and waiting for it to erode and get challenging is not trail building 101.
Have you actually ridden the new trails at Springs?
The drainage is excellent. The trail follows the natural topography of the land and there are plenty of bumps, humps, switchbacks, dips and visible roots that are just now coming to the surface. And the School loop west portion has retained plenty of it's old character.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links) Listen, this is real simple. Spring's didn't do this because they wanted too. They lost property rights to use the trails east of 460. These trails were not on Springs property. My feeling is, one should feel somewhat fortunate that they are choosing to build new trails. Instead of just leaving it as is.
Besides, if you choose, you can still access the old trails with a little effort.